Structured conversation
Students interact with an AI agent whose behavior is shaped by a challenge template. The interaction requires questions, evidence, explanations, and revision.
Full docs
These pages explain the learning model, roles, current beta scope, and safety boundaries without exposing internal prompts, credentials, or deployment details.
Learning model
Students interact with an AI agent whose behavior is shaped by a challenge template. The interaction requires questions, evidence, explanations, and revision.
A judge agent evaluates progress after turns against checkpoints. A completion agent produces scores and a narrative report when the session ends.
Teachers receive a transcript, checkpoint timeline, dimension scores, hint level, completion summary, and any configured reflection response.
Students see the challenge brief and natural-language hints. Internal directives and checkpoint details stay hidden during active work.
Current beta scope
| Area | Current beta | Planned direction |
|---|---|---|
| Roles | PlatformAdmin, Teacher, InstitutionAdmin, Student, and IndependentLearner are live role-based paths. | Self-registration (built, switched off in the beta), plus independent and institution subscription tiers. |
| Challenge authoring | Templates of five challenge types (Socratic Constraint, The Adversary, Devil's Advocate Loop, Counterfactual Reasoning, Analogy Construction) written in plain fields, version publishing, and assignment. Independent learners write, edit and archive challenges of their own in any of those types. | The remaining challenge types, programs, community sharing of learner-written challenges, and richer customization. |
| Classroom operations | A teacher builds rosters and assigns an ordered chain of challenges with a narrative theme to a student or roster, inside an enforced Open At / Close At window, and can cancel an assignment to stop it at once. | Join codes, invitations, bulk imports, co-teachers, archives, and scheduling extensions. |
| Reports | Student and teacher session reports with transcript, checkpoints, scores, and summary. | Institution dashboards, exports, gradebook and LMS workflows. |
| Commercial model | Not implemented as a beta workflow. | Institution seats and independent, teacher, and student subscription tiers. |
Session lifecycle
The student opens an assigned or available challenge and begins after reading the brief.
Every turn is saved. The judge tracks progress and hints can escalate after lack of productive progress.
The student may pause and resume. A safeguard flag pauses the session until a teacher reviews it.
Completion produces a report. Partial completion still preserves the record and relevant feedback.
Safety and integrity
Potential distress, self-harm, or abuse disclosures can pause a session for teacher review. A teacher can clear or escalate using the local process. Automated external alerts are not part of the beta.
The product preserves reasoning evidence rather than relying on AI-writing detection. Suspicious patterns are review signals, not automatic accusations or blocks.
Role guides
Manage your institution's users and their teacher, student, or admin memberships.
Institution guideBuild a challenge template, publish it, assign a chain to a roster, and review reports.
Teacher guideSign in, find an assignment, work through a challenge, and read your report.
Student guideSign in, browse the challenge library or write your own challenge, run it, and revisit your results.
Independent learner guideA fast route to the guide for your role.
Get started